Davis Hammett and OShara Meesha Hayes, main organizers of the Kansas People's Agenda events at the Capitol on January 10, close out the rally. We all then dispersed to lobby our legislators with the mandate to tell them our stories! The gathering was dubbed the "People's State of the State" and was designed to fill in the blanks left by the Governor's State of the State Address the day before.
Big Bluestem Rapid Responders: Advancing the People's Agenda!
Friday, January 12, 2018
Davis Hammett and OShara Meesha Hayes Close Out the Rally!
Davis Hammett and OShara Meesha Hayes, main organizers of the Kansas People's Agenda events at the Capitol on January 10, close out the rally. We all then dispersed to lobby our legislators with the mandate to tell them our stories! The gathering was dubbed the "People's State of the State" and was designed to fill in the blanks left by the Governor's State of the State Address the day before.
Thursday, January 11, 2018
"We Are Family, and We Care!"--Kansas People's Agenda, January 10, 2018
She emphasized that collective action can be hard work. It requires listening with humility; accepting our own fallibility; coexisting with discomfort; reaching out to others; leaving our little enclaves; lifting up those who are hardest hit and most marginalized.
Young Pastor Is Initial Speaker at Kansas People's Agenda Rally, January 10, 2018
Tom Giessel, Kansas Farmers Union, at the "People's State of the State" Rally, Jan. 10, 2018
Kansas People's Agenda: State of the State Rally, Jan. 10, 2018
Saturday, November 25, 2017
Town Hall in Frankfort, 11-22-17: Sen. Moran Challenged on Regressive Tax Bill, Healthcare
The median household income in Kansas is $50,000. The median in Marshall County, where the town hall was held, is $32,000.
Students also pointed out that the interest on their loans would no longer be deductible, and that tuition waivers would be taxed as income.
Healthcare was also a huge issue at the town hall, since the Senate version of the tax bill includes a repeal of the individual mandate. This young man talks about the human cost of that repeal:
Monday, May 15, 2017
Rep. Marshall: Health Care Is Too Important for Baseless Claims
The Salina Journal and the Emporia Gazette are publishing an abbreviated version of this letter. Here is the letter in its entirety:
To the Editor:
Our congressman, Rep. Roger
Marshall, M.D. (R-Great Bend) voted for
the American Health Care Act, saying it would be good for patients and good for
Kansas hospitals.
However, he was contradicted
by Andrew Gurman , M.D., president of the American Medical Association, who
warned that the AHCA would cause “serious harm to patients and the health care
delivery system.”
Rep. Marshall, what do you
know that the AMA does not?
In a telephone conference
following the passage of the bill, reporters gave Rep. Marshall plenty of
opportunities to answer that question.
They repeatedly confronted Rep. Marshall with the fact that what he says
about the bill is just the opposite of what health care experts say about
it.
But the congressman avoided the
substance of those questions. He never
challenged critics’ methodology, data,
or assumptions. Instead, if a conclusion
undermined his narrative, he dismissed or disparaged the source.
For example, when told that
Sheldon Weisgrau, the director of Kansas’s Health Reform Resource Project, says
“AHCA would mean less money for Kansas because it cuts Medicaid and over the
next 10 years will cause 24 million people to lose insurance,” Marshall said, “I have never heard of Sheldon
Whatever-his-last-name-is, so I’m not sure what kind of expert I would consider
him.”
When asked why the American
Hospital Association and the National Rural Health Association oppose the AHCA,
if it’s so good for hospitals, especially rural hospitals, Marshall replied, “I
don’t think they totally understand the bill.”
When told that numerous
analysts say the AHCA would hurt “the elderly, the disabled, and especially
those in categories of low-income,” Marshall said, “That’s what the national
media wants to spin.”
The Council Grove Republican published the letter in full, as did the Manhattan Mercury and the Wabaunsee County Signal Enterprise. |
But there is one source Rep.
Marshall does not discredit: Secretary
of Health and Human Services Tom Price, a long-time proponent of reducing
funding for Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. In the
same interview in which Marshall made the infamous comments about the poor not
wanting health care, he also said he considered Sec. Price “a brother.”
Rep. Marshall faithfully echoes
what Sec. Price says about the AHCA.
But in a recent interview on
CNN’s “State of the Union,” Sec. Price earned Four Pinocchios from Fact Checker
at the Washington Post for his misleading claims about the AHCA.
So what evidence is there
that Rep. Marshall’s nice-sounding promises are actually true—and not just an
effort to get us to accept the right-wing’s long-held goal—to reduce public
benefits and transfer that money to the rich?
That question dominated Rep.
Marshall’s town hall in Wamego on May 10.
Over and over again, constituents
asked him:
Where is your evidence, Rep. Marshall?
What studies or data are you relying on?
What are your views based
upon?
He had no answer!
He asked us simply to trust
his years of experience as a physician.
But Rep. Marshall, the
American Medical Association has a few years of experience, too. And
unlike you, the AMA uses data, studies, and analysis.
They’re the ones telling us
the AHCA would cause “serious harm” to Kansans and Kansas hospitals. You can’t dispute that conclusion--but you
voted for the bill anyway?
How then can you say you are
keeping your physicians’ oath to “do no harm?”
If the health care system gets
worse, rather than better—if your claims turn out to be as baseless as they
currently appear--right-wing catch phrases will not protect Kansans from increased
physical suffering or financial pain.
Sincerely yours,
Margy Stewart
11003 Lower McDowell Rd.
Junction City, Kansas 66441
785.539.5592
Margystewart785@gmail.com
Here is the letter as it appeared in the Daily Union. In the interest of space, the editors removed the title "Rep." from in front of Marshall's name. I'm glad they published most of the content, but I wish they hadn't removed the title. To me, calling a congressman by his last name alone sounds rude!
Here is the letter as it appeared in the Daily Union. In the interest of space, the editors removed the title "Rep." from in front of Marshall's name. I'm glad they published most of the content, but I wish they hadn't removed the title. To me, calling a congressman by his last name alone sounds rude!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)